Over an extended period, coercive messages persisted. At first, reportedly from a retired cop and a retired army general, and then from law enforcement directly. In the end, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh states he was summoned to the local precinct and told clearly: remain silent or face serious consequences.
Shaikh is among those resisting a expensive redevelopment plan where this historic settlement – a massive informal community with rich history – will be razed and modernized by a corporate giant.
"The unique ecosystem of Dharavi is exceptional in the globe," says Shaikh. "However their intention is to dismantle our community and silence our voices."
The cramped lanes of the slum stand in sharp opposition to the towering buildings and luxury apartments that overshadow the area. Homes are constructed informally and often lacking adequate facilities, small-scale operations emit toxic smoke and the atmosphere is permeated by the unpleasant stench of uncovered waste channels.
For certain residents, the prospect of the slum's redevelopment into a developed area of luxury high-rises, organized recreational areas, contemporary malls and residences with proper sanitation is an aspirational dream achieved.
"We don't have adequate medical facilities, paved pathways or drainage and there's nowhere for kids to enjoy," explains a tea vendor, 56, who migrated from Tamil Nadu in that period. "The only way is to demolish everything and provide modern residences."
However, some, like Shaikh, are opposing the redevelopment.
All recognize that the slum, consistently overlooked as informal housing, is desperately requiring economic input and modernization. However they worry that this plan – lacking resident participation – might turn a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into an elite enclave, forcing out the disadvantaged, immigrant populations who have been there since the late 1800s.
These were these excluded, migrant workers who established the empty marshland into a frequently examined example of community resilience and commercial output, whose output is worth between a significant amount and $2m annually, making it among the globe's biggest unofficial markets.
Out of about 1 million inhabitants living in the dense 220-hectare area, a minority will be qualified for alternative accommodation in the project, which is projected to take an extended timeframe to complete. Additional residents will be transferred to wastelands and saline fields on the distant periphery of the city, risking divide a long-established social network. Some will receive no housing at all.
Residents permitted to stay in the neighborhood will be allocated units in high-rise buildings, a significant rupture from the natural, collective approach of dwelling and laboring that has maintained Dharavi for so long.
Businesses from clothing production to pottery and waste processing are likely to shrink in number and be relocated to an allocated "commercial zone" distant from residential areas.
For residents like Shaikh, a craftsman and multi-generational of his family to call home Dharavi, the redevelopment presents an existential threat. His makeshift, three-storey workshop produces garments – tailored coats, suede trenches, studded bomber jackets – distributed in premium stores in the city's affluent areas and abroad.
Household members resides in the spaces downstairs and laborers and garment workers – workers from north India – reside in the same building, allowing him to sustain operations. Beyond the slum, accommodation prices are often 10 times more expensive for minimal space.
At the administrative buildings nearby, a conceptual model of the Dharavi project depicts a contrasting perspective. Fashionable residents gather on bicycles and electric vehicles, purchasing continental baguettes and pastries and having coffee on an outdoor area outside a restaurant and Ice-Cream. This depicts a world away from the 20-rupee idli sambar first meal and 5-rupee chai that maintains the neighborhood.
"This represents no development for our community," explains the protester. "It's a massive land development that will price people out for our community to continue."
There is also distrust of the development company. Managed by a prominent businessman – one of India's most powerful and a close ally of the national leader – the conglomerate has encountered allegations of preferential treatment and financial impropriety, which it rejects.
Although local authorities describes it as a joint project, the corporation contributed nearly a billion dollars for its controlling interest. A case claiming that the redevelopment was unfairly awarded to the business group is being considered in the nation's highest judicial body.
After they started to publicly resist the project, Shaikh and other residents assert they have been subjected to ongoing efforts of pressure and threats – comprising messages, direct threats and insinuations that speaking against the initiative was equivalent to speaking against the country – by people they assert work for the business conglomerate.
Among those suspected of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c