Officials in the city have taken into custody thirteen individuals on suspected charges of involuntary manslaughter in connection with the recent devastating fire, amid growing public outcry over the detentions of citizens demanding accountability.
Rescue teams continued to search through the seven-building complex of the Wang Fuk Court residential area in the Tai Po district on the start of the week, days after the cityâs deadliest fire in seven and a half decades. The death toll rose to one hundred and fifty-one and is anticipated to climb further as the search goes on. About forty people are still missing.
The housing complex, housing almost five thousand people, had been undergoing extensive renovations that have been associated with the fireâs cause. In the wake of the tragedy, public fury has escalated over alleged past safety violations by the contractor working at the site and poor oversight of safety codes, fuelled by revelations that occupants had been complaining about the work for a year.
On Monday afternoon, authorities said anti-corruption authorities had detained thirteen people over the disaster so far, including the directors and an technical advisor of a contracting firm, and had âimmediately begun a thorough probe along the lines of involuntary manslaughterâ.
A top administrator stated that 7 of 20 tested samples of the scaffolding net used around the buildings did not meet flame-resistance requirements. Initial testing had found samples were up to code, but the official said the cheaper, substandard netting had been put in areas difficult to access in order to avoid discovery, labeling it a âshameful actâ.
âTheir sole aim was to make money at the expense of peopleâs lives,â the official stated.
As accusations of safety violations grow, alongside reports that official bodies had issued several seemingly ignored cautions, residents have questioned why no officials have yet been held accountable. Instead, two civilians were reportedly taken into custody by national security police.
One individual, identified as a Hong Kong student, was detained over an online petition that made âfour requestsâ for guaranteed support for the affected families and accountability for those at to blame, including any negligent or culpable public servants.
Reports said the student was detained for âinciting disaffectionâ. Police did not verify the arrest, saying only that they âwill take actions according to the situation and in compliance with the legal frameworkâ.
News outlets also reported the detention of a ex-local representative.
Asked about the detentions, the secretary of security said there had been âmisleading statements onlineâ that were intended to undermine public security. âTherefore, we must take appropriate measures, including law enforcement measures,â the official told a press conference. âOperational details cannot be disclosed as they involve national security.â
On local online platforms, people criticised the arrests of civilians. âNational security must be prioritised even if the victims are still trapped in the building,â said one.
Some commenters drew comparisons to the Chinese mainland. âThe mainland, these crimes are termed âpicking quarrels and provoking troubleâ,â said one commenter. âThey are typically met with severe penalties. Social order overrides everything.â
A different user said: âSince we are following the mainlandâs methods, by dealing with the person who asks questions, nobody will venture to question, and therefore the city's administration will have no problems.â
The detentions came after advisories by security officials that they would crack down on anyone deemed to be exploiting the incident to stir up âhostileâ feelings.
Prior to the detentions, officials had already begun showing heightened sensitivity to the public reaction. Since the suppression of earlier unrest, public assemblies have been tightly controlled. In the immediate aftermath, volunteer supporters quickly organized aid operations, with hundreds of people employing vehicles and public transport to deliver large quantities of garments, supplies and other essentials for the survivors.
Nevertheless, by evening, armed police were patrolling the vicinity, and government officials eventually assumed control from the community coordinators.
The appeal over which the individual was reportedly detained was initiated on Friday evening. Its âfour demandsâ echoed the terminology of past protest movements but did not call for political change.
The individual told media that he was only âputting forward very basic requestsâ.
âIf these ideas are considered seditious or âcrossing the lineâ, then I feel I cannot foresee the outcomes of anything any more, and I can only do what I truly believe is right,â he stated.